Thursday, October 06, 2022

Uncle Clarence's Ginni Problem

 Clarence Thomas has a big problem. 

First of all, Judge Thomas has no business being on the Supreme Court. His presence is an embarrassment to anyone with an IQ above room temperature. We now know that he is as corrupt as anyone who has ever sat on that bench. How this pathetic Uncle Tom Negro is able to sleep at night is a question for the psychiatrists and not for me. 

And we now have absolute proof of his corruption: he has been caught red handed making decisions on cases in which his wife is involved. When a recent decision involving weather or not emails between Gini and Mark Meadows could be released to the January 6th committee, Thomas was the only one of the nine justices who voted NO. Did he believe that no one would notice blatant the conflict-of-interest? Who knows what the silly bastard is thinking on any given day.

As soon as the loyal party of opposition retakes the House and Senate in January (Oh please-Oh please-Oh please) he needs to be impeached at once. In fact, the removal of Clarence Thomas should be their first order of business in January of 2023. 

My knowledge of American history is quite broad and comprehensive. If there is any associate justice from our past who was as corrupt as Clarence, I'm not aware of it.  Even my ancestor, Roger Brook Taney, who illegally schemed with President James Buchanan to have the Dred Scott Decision passed into law, was not quite on the same level of corruption as Judge Thomas.

Almost exactly fifteen years ago, I wrote a piece about Clarence Thomas on this site. An Excerpt: 

According to [Judge] Thomas in his recently published memoir, My Grandfather's Son, when he received his diploma from Yale Law School, he put a "fifteen cents" sticker on it and relegated it to the basement of his home. You see, Clarence Thomas believes that it was the very existence of affirmative action that made his law degree all-but-worthless. To his way of thinking, he would have been much better off had he just pursued his dream of becoming a lawyer only on the merits of his talent and abilities and not relied on the good intentions of all those evil, white, liberal, do-gooders. In his mind, his place on the Supreme Court would today be all-the-more significant and he would be sitting on that revered bench free of the guilty conscience that obviously torments him to this very day. His place in the halls of justice would have meant so much more had all of those silly and stupid Great Society types not interfered with his ambitions.
Question: Just where do you think Clarence Thomas would be today had it not been for affirmative action?
Answer: He would be mounted on the front lawn of some beer distributor's home in Albany, Georgia, wearing a jockey uniform and holding a lamp.

FUN FACT: I believe that Anita Hill was telling the truth.

Yeah, Clarence Thomas has got to go - the sooner the better. We can no longer afford to have this unenlightened buffoon sitting on the highest court in the land. It's embarrassing.

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY


The Brethren 
by Bob Woodward

This look into the late seventies Supremes is well worth your time.

Hi ho.


At 5:00 PM, Blogger Pappyz said...

Thanks for this Tom. My question is how the hell was he even allowed to adjudicate in a case involving his wife ? Why were the other 8 justices not screamin to holy hell that he could even be part of the hearing?

That's a giant WTF for me.

At 8:07 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...


What case is Justice Thomas adjudicating where his wife is involved?

At 8:19 PM, Blogger Pappyz said...

Clarence Thomas was the lone dissent in the Supreme Court's January order rejecting Trump's bid to withhold documents from the January 6 panel.

At 9:37 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Which case?

At 11:06 AM, Blogger rustcoal said...

Not "Coco Chow", "Fang Fang".

At 12:06 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Wife Supremacy
Brides of Biden’s handlers get the sweetheart deals.

onica P. Medina is the new “Special Envoy for Biodiversity and Water Resources,” the State Department recently announced, without noting that Medina is also the wife of Ron Klain, chief of staff to Joe Biden. The Washington Post story, headlined, “In a first, U.S. appoints a diplomat for plants and animals,” also failed to note the Klain connection. This sort of nepotism, coupled with media malpractice, has surrounded Joe Biden for a long time.

At 12:20 PM, Blogger Dave Dubya said...

Anonymous wants to deflect from all the nepotism in Trump world.
Mitch's "Coco Chow" was made a Cabinet member and Jr. Eric, Jared and Ivanka were "advisors" who couldn't pass a security clearance.

It's called projection.

At 1:44 PM, Blogger Pappyz said...

Adjudication.............Clarence Thomas was the ONLY “no” vote in an 8-1 decision to allow the release of Trump’s 1/6 documents showing plans to order the military to seize voting machines.

At 5:06 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

who is the "big Guy"?

Dave, are you a Christian?

At 10:24 PM, Blogger Dave Dubya said...

"The Big Guy" is another Big Lie.

"Christians" like Vern believe it's OK to lie about people you hate.

Robert Maguire Research Director at CREW (Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington) explains “the big guy” for the brainwashed fascists:

Since we appear poised to start fresh Hunter Biden news cycle, some reminders are in order:

1) Hunter has no role in his father's administration
2) Hunter does not run a business that his father profits from as president that's used as an influence machine for special interests.

Also worth noting that Joe Biden hasn't spent his livelong days as president tweeting incessantly about the investigation, calling on his AG to do something about the Trump holdover in charge of the investigation or firing his AG to get someone who will.

And AG Garland has made clear the administration will not influence the case.

There are going to be plenty of people who are going to try to contrast this to the criticisms that Trump's children faced when he was president. They will surely suggest that the ethics issues raised by Hunter's conduct is worse. They are not even close.

Ivanka and Jared were given high-level executive branch jobs—and security clearances—which they were wholly unqualified for. Like their father, they brought innumerable conflicts of interest into office with them, and they scoffed at even basic ethics rules.

Don Jr and Eric ran a business that their father constantly travelled to and still profited from as president. Those businesses were used by foreign governments, wealthy donors, and special interests to enrich the Trumps while trying to curry favor with the Trump administration.

Neither of these situations is remotely similar to Hunter Biden's, as it relates to his father's presidency.

And to be clear, I'm only speaking about this as it relates to his father's administration. If Hunter committed crimes, he should be prosecuted for them like anyone else.

The "wHaT aBoUt tHe '10% fOr tHe BiG gUy' eMAiL???" gang has logged on. So please enlighten me: - Explain the subsequent "my Chairman" email and his "emphatic NO" response - Why hasn't any of this shown up in Biden's tax returns/financial disclosures?

Biden has released more than a decade of tax returns. As VP and POTUS, his taxes are automatically audited BY LAW. He files personal financial disclosures under penalty of perjury and posts them on the White House website. Where is the hard proof?

Again, a subsequent email refers to "my Chairman" whom Hunter says he gave "an emphatic NO." This was confirmed by none other than Fox News

Hey kudos for at least admitting you don't have evidence. If any does arise, I will gladly join the chorus calling for accountability.

Yes. Bobulinski did indeed say that Joe was the "Big Guy." Yet it was later confirmed (by FOX) that Joe was the "Chairman" referenced in a subsequent email, in which he gave "an emphatic NO" to being involved.
Vern's the kind of "Christian" who will ignore the truth and continue to lie about people he hates

At 2:11 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dear Hunter,

Who is the "Big Guy"?

There is substantial evidence, from documents and witness statements, that the Biden family, including President Joe Biden, may have been involved in criminal activity involving, among other issues, foreign entities tied to Ukraine and China. Follow our page to learn more.

Dave, where did you learn so much about Christianity? What have you done to make you such an expert?

At 2:12 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Hunter says he gave "an emphatic NO" and you believe Hunter?


At 3:04 PM, Blogger Dave Dubya said...

"Hunter, Hunter, Hunter!"

Where's the proof?

But "Hunter, Hunter, Hunter!"

Show us the proof.

But "Hunter, Hunter, Hunter!"

Show where Joe was involved with Hunter's alleged crimes and was paid.

"But he may have been involved in criminal activity! If we say it, it must be true! And Hunter, Hunter, Hunter!"

If Hunter committed a crime, nobody objects to prosecuting him. So why not prosecute for Trump's crimes?

Deflect to "Hunter, Hunter, Hunter!"

I don't answer hateful, lying fake Christian's questions. Anyone who supports Trump after he praised thugs for terrorizing Congress and beating cops is a fake Christian.

Change my mind.

At 5:11 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yup, Hunter, Hunter Hunter, along with the rest of the Biden Family Crime syndicate including the "Big Guy".

Dave thinks being asked if he is a Christian is to answer a hateful, lying fake Christian's question...Just how stupid does he think we are? Just like his name, Dave's as fake as they come.

Why should any person answer any question from Dave about their faith?


Post a Comment

<< Home