Should I Stay or Should I Go?
I was almost tempted to relay my thoughts uncensored on this fine Autumn morn, but I figured it would not at all be in my best interests at this time to have my intentions misconstrued by the Secret Service. Better to leave some things unsaid if you know what I mean.
In his answer to a question in the White House press room last week as to whether or not he would leave the office of the presidency if Joe Biden were elected by the voters on November the third, Donald Trump responded by saying “We’ll have to see”. Clearly this irresponsible jackass does not understand the Constitution, which says that the winner of the election automatically assumes the office at exactly 12 Noon on inauguration Day. For most of our history, that day fell on March the fourth. Since 1937, it has fallen on the twentieth of January - which is a jolly good thing, too. Can you imagine another one month and twelve additional days of this grotesque fool running the ship of state? No, me neither.
As predicted on this site for almost a year, the last three months of this disgusting administration will prove to be the worst constitutional nightmare in over a century-and-a-half. Come hell or High Noon, Donald Trump is determined to overthrow the United States government via means of a coup d'état that he honestly believes is going to be successful. As dumb as the man obviously is, he could not possibly be stupid enough not to know that any coup is only possible with the assistance of a corrupt and compliant military. Does he honestly believe that the joint chiefs of staff at the Pentagon would possibly go in this direction? He probably does. This is going to get interesting.
The Donald is in the process of what might only be described as a "self crucifixion". This is a man so desperate to expurgate from public knowledge the scope of his crimes that he would go to such insane lengths to cover them up. The key word in that last sentence is "insane". This is a man who is playing with a deck of only four cards - all of them being jokers. Between now and January 20 will be the most dangerous period for the United States in the life on any one of you reading this.
I've lived through some extraordinary times in my life but - I've gotta tell you - this one is the icing on the cake, folks!
The death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg could not have come at a less fortuitous time in the American saga. Amy Coney Barrett, Trump's nominee to replace her, is a far-right zealot of any thinking person's worst nightmare. If she is approved by the senate (and I suspect that there is a slender chance that she might not be; wishful thinking, I know) she could possibly be on that bench forty years from today. Trump is planning on challenging Biden's victory with the Supreme Court, the lame argument being that all of those mail-in ballots were fraudulent. Would Barrett, Alito, Kavanagh, Gorsuch and Uncle Thomas dare to pervert that highest bench in the land by subverting the will of the American people? As I said before, this is going to get interesting.
All of this is a moot point. Joe Biden will be raising his right hand to take the presidential oath of office at 12 o'clock noon on January 20, 2021. Trump will no doubt be barricaded deep in the basement of the executive mansion at that hour. The moment Joe says, "So help me, God", he should turn to the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff and order him to get Trump - and everyone associated with his administration out of the building. The chairman, understanding fully well who is the boss, will comply.
Of this I have no doubt.
posted by Tom Degan @ 8:42 AM
59 comments
59 Comments:
So the billionaire con man paid no taxes for ten years and paid $750.00 for just two years while I paid 10 times that and I am just a carpenter working by myself.
Trump is a serial thief who never should of never been allowed to run for president, he ripped off thousands of contractors and tradesmen over the decades.
The big mystery is that Trump played golf equal to a years work in four years so how is he still fat?
Tom,
Blooger help; Might as well be pulling the elephant by the tail to halt.
Posted this in previous blog:
Lots of complaints emanating from the blogosphere regarding Google's "new and improved" format. We all say, "If it ain't broke........."
Probably a new programmer came in and said, "Oh, I can fix that up better!" not understanding all the reasons why it is the way it is. Simple, but with good features that don't get in your way.
This site https://krydderuglen.blogspot.com/2020/09/experimenting-with-blogger.html shows you how to return to the legacy version.
The page is in Danish, but there is a selection box for English.
Good Luck
woodenman, you run a small business, do you take every legal tax break available when filing your tax returns?
"I finally read the NYT Trump tax story because I wanted to see what line was being reported for taxes owed and I came across this about the $750 in 2016 and 2017. Per the NYT own story, Trump actually paid to the US Treasury $1 million in 2016 and $4.2 million in 2017."
Alexandria Brown
As Brown further noted, “Trump PAID, as in transferred to the US Treasury, $1 million in 2016 and $4.2 million in 2017. Note also that most of the overpayment was rolled forward, not refunded.”
People who own and run businesses take losses in some years, and pay little or nothing in taxes, and make great sums in other years and pay much more in taxes.
They also take advantage of tax breaks, tax credits, and tax incentives — just like you and I do.
Here’s a screencap from the actual NYT report:
The Treasury was millions of dollars richer in 2016 and 2017, thanks to checks signed “Donald J. Trump.” But thanks to our overly complicated tax code, the line-item amount Trump technically paid for those years was $750.
Fact Check: Are you kidding us with this nonsense, NYT?
In reality, Trump has paid enough in taxes just this century to buy more than one $85 million F-35A Lightning II stealth strike jet.
I haven’t paid enough in taxes my entire working life to buy a single one of the $2 million helmets F-35 pilots wear.
Feeling like a bit of a slacker here on that score. How how about you woodenman, Mozart, Dave Dubya, TB3, Tom, etc. have you ever used a legal tax deduction? Or do you always over pay the govt?
Then there is the felony that was committed by releasing ANY American's tax information, but since Obama weaponized the IRS (see IRS and Tea Party) unless it's a liberal's tax info being released, not so much.
JTF not only apologizing for trump AGAIN, but trying to push that "Obama weaponized the IRS" BS on us again.
Instead of saying "see this" WHY DON'T YOU POST YOUR ACTUAL SOURCES?
You make the claim, YOU post the evidence, that's how it works. But you have no actual sources do you? Nothing but twitter and other OPINION sites.
Maybe that's because that entire "IRS" thing was debunked years ago. If you are going to start a (cough cough) "non profit" and it's main goal is to convince people NOT to pay taxes, you can expect a little extra attention from the IRS.
https://www.newsweek.com/remember-irs-scandal-it-was-fake-news-all-along-681674
Chuck, I read that Trump paid almost no taxes, if that is not the case then Trump should sue the NYT for lying.
This comment has been removed by the author.
I love how this is the rhetorical angle the Trump Superfans have decided makes for a good argument.
FYI
One Norwegian parliamentarian and one Swedish parliamentarian each nominated Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize. The Norwegian, Christian Tybring-Gjedde, highlighted the historic UAE peace deal while the Swede, Magnus Jacobsson, focused on the Serbia-Kosovo deal.
On Monday, Sky News reported on a third Nobel Prize nomination for Donald Trump, this time coming from four law professors in Australia. Law professor David Flint announced he was nominating Trump on the basis of the “Trump Doctrine.”
“He went ahead and negotiated against all advice, but he did it with common sense. He negotiated directly with the Arab states concerned and Israel and brought them together,” Flint told Sky News.
Flint described the Trump Doctrine as “something extraordinary,” based on “common sense” and “national interest.”
“What he has done with the Trump Doctrine is that he has decided he would no longer have America in endless wars, wars which achieve nothing but the killing of thousands of young Americans,” the professor argued. “So he’s reducing America’s tendency to get involved in any and every war.”
“The states are lining up, Arab and Middle-Eastern, to join that network of peace which will dominate the Middle-East,” Flint added. “He is really producing peace in the world in a way in which none of his predecessors did, and he fully deserves the Nobel Peace Prize.”
Sources:
Christian Tybring-Gjedde Norwegian parliamentarian Google him Mozart.
Magnus Jacobsson Swedish parliamentarian Google him Mozart.
David Flint Australian Law professor Google him Mozart.
Sky News Google it Mozart.
Stop your whining, or do you need help in how to use Google?
Do you pay more in taxes than you are required to? If not why not?
Tom,
I'd like to help you out. Since it sounds like you can't afford the cost for the tech services you need, where should I send you a check for $5.00? It's the least I can do, for as much as I disagree with your positions (except those on the Beetles), unlike Dave Dubya, you walk the talk when it comes to our right to freedom of speech.
I am surprised however, that none of your liberal friends haven't offered to help you out, guess when the rubber meets the road they can't be counted on.
Mozart,
"Maybe that's because that entire "IRS" thing was debunked years ago. SOURCE!! Oh left wing Newsweek, LOL
Do you and woodenman pay more income taxes that are due? Why not?
woodenman, President Trump paid a lot more than $750 in taxes, who should be sued along with NYT is the person/s who committed the felony by releasing the tax info of a citizen to the public.
According to trump in the 2016 campaign, he was "too smart to pay taxes".
Come on, we all knew this. Trump lost a BILLION dollars over a decade. He deliberately lost money in certain areas to avoid taxes, then overhyped his assets to get loans he never paid back. He ran out of supporters in the USA and Europe and ended up in Russia. Now his chickens are coming home to roost. The interest is due and he's broke.
JTF/Anonymous, Newsweek is a credible source. Maybe I should have used Twitter? LOL
Oh and it's the BEATLES. Also, post the articles, I'm not spending all night googling things that don't exist.
I am required to pay more taxes than an alleged billionaire. So are you, yet you take it like a good gimp.
Trump is not a "citizen" he's the President of the United States> One cannot even be a prison guard with massive debt because of the chances for blackmail and/or "deals" with criminals to pay it off. The POTUS is even more susceptible to people offering "favors" in exchange for cash...you know LIKE VLADIMIR PUTIN?
https://thehill.com/homenews/news/332270-eric-trump-in-2014-we-dont-rely-on-american-banks-we-have-all-the-funding-we
As for Peace in the ME, it's easy to have peace when you have annihilated all your political rivals and outlawed dissent and free thinking.
All I know about David Flint is he wants Australia to have a King. That would be consistent since trump thinks he IS King.
The "Trump doctrine" being suck up to any tin plated dictator that kisses your as a little, and screw the "free world". Lie, steal, cheat, etc.
"As for Peace in the ME, it's easy to have peace when you have annihilated all your political rivals and outlawed dissent and free thinking."
Sounds like a liberal fascist.
So, you want to see the tax returns of a billionaire that became a politician. A smart person would want to see the tax returns of a politician who became a millionaire.
JTF, fascism is RIGHT wing, but your "Pee Wee Herman" response (I know you are but what am I?) is typical. IS THERE ANYTHING YOU WON'T APOLOGIZE FOR TRUMP OVER?
He's lied about pretty much everything, not the least of which is his financial status. He's no billionaire.He never was and never will be. He's a con artist who squandered a family fortune and now is deeply in debt to RUSSIAN banks, because they were the only ones left who would allow him to borrow money. Isn't it obvious the way he sucks up to Vlad Putin?
During the 2016 campaign he actually bragged about being "Too smart to pay taxes" and then refused to produce his tax records even after repeatedly promising to do so. He's spent as much time trying to keep his finances hidden as he has golfing, and that's going some.
He stole from his own charities, one of which was a CHILDREN'S CANCER fund. had to pay MILLIONS in fines after "Trump University" was exposed as fraud. Talk to ANY businessman from NY and they will tell you what a phony he is. His own family knows he's a con artist.
The bottom line, and something you cannot deny, is that you would never allow any Democrat to get away with even ONE of the myriad cons, schemes and CRIMES, You praise Trump for.
One has to wonder why. Hey, I get conservative values. I obviously support the 2nd amendment, I simply don;t think it's "holy and untouchable" like Neocons think it is. I own guns, I just don;t need an arsenal of high powered, high capacity, military style, weapons to hunt, or "defend my home" I can shoot straight.
I too want a balanced budget, smaller government and a strong economy. Conservatives CLAIM to want those things as well, yet you cut taxes for the rich, crank up the already bloated MILITARY budget and then BORROW from CHINA to pay for it, while neglecting the needs of the very people you claim to care about. You want government JUST small enough to fit into our bedrooms. You want abortion outlawed yet oppose anything that would make it less necessary
like free access to birth control, REAL sex education and the paying of living wages.
BTW, paying a fair wage for a days work would also cut down that "welfare" you hate so much.
The difference is that the GOP has worked to convince you that ANY education is bad. Obviously an ignorant public is easier to fool and control. They have convinced you that helping the poor is bad, even though that was KIND of a big thing with the Jesus you claim to worship.
And speaking of Jesus, doesn't it strike you as a BIT odd that the "Party of Christian values" is 180 degrees opposed to everything that the Jesus of the bible instructed us to do?
Now, watch the debates. Will there be any actual policy questions, or will it be a shit show like last year where all Trump did was whine about "E mails" and make sure he was in sight of the camera?
Fox Entertainment is running it, so I doubt it will have anything Trump would actually have to answer.
OK, now watch as JTF/Anonymous comes back with infantile insults and name calling, while addressing NOTHING I mentioned.
OH and JTF, Mitch McConnell is a "politician who became a millionaire" so you tell us. hey, It could have been his in law's cocaine empire, who knows?
Mitch is a piece of work isn;t he? Can't have a SCOTUS pick 10 MONTHS before an election because "The people need to have a choice" (We had chosen Obama as President, so there was that) but NOW he's got to ram this pick through congress 6 WEEKS before the election.
Hypocrite much?
LOL "Fascist" is RIGHT WING.
You don't comment on Trump's obvious tax fraud.
You don't comment on him stealing from a children's cancer charity
You don't comment on McConnell's obvious hypocrisy
You don't comment on how I agree with most "traditional" conservative values.
But you double down on "liberal fascist"
And here I thought we were all "Socialists". One cannot be both.
BTW, I noticed that after you said I always have to have the "last word" you made sure you answered every post I made. I even went back and read several past blogs and guess who is almost always the "last word"? JTF/Anonymous.
go figure.
Now, come back with more nonsense and prove me right.
No, everyone even remotely critical of the President, regardless of ideological bent is now a Marxist. Come on, Mozart. Didn't you read the memo?
That was an excellent post at 11.34
"As for Peace in the ME, it's easy to have peace when you have annihilated all your political rivals and outlawed dissent and free thinking."
Mozart
Liberal.
What is Joe trying to hide in his ear?
The Trump campaign wants the Biden campaign to allow a third party to inspect the ears of the debaters for electronic devices or transmitters. The President has consented to this inspection, but Biden has not – so far. (2/3)
— Pat Ward (@WardDPatrick) September 29, 2020
The Biden campaign requested two breaks (one every thirty minutes) during tonight’s program, which was denied by their Trump counterparts, in negotiations over the last several weeks. (3/3)
— Pat Ward (@WardDPatrick) September 29, 2020
Really telling stuff here
Trump requested a third party ear inspection… Biden refused
Biden requested a break every 30 minutes… Trump refused pic.twitter.com/89wO4dwkqD
— Jewish Deplorable 🇺🇸 (@TrumpJew) September 29, 2020
Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii) has raised an alarm over ballot harvesting and voter fraud, filing a bill to prevent the practice. Gabbard, a former presidential candidate, has shown extraordinary willingness to buck the propagandistic groupthink in her party, and Democrats have not always appreciated it. Yet she is right to warn about ballot harvesting and voter fraud, and she even noted that the recent Project Veritas sting videos illustrate her point. Ask your Congressperson to support H.R. 8285, the Election Fraud Prevention Act, to stop Trump from cheating.
Ballot Harvester in Ilhan Omar's District: 'I Have Forty People,' Pay $800 Per Ballot
https://pjmedia.com/election/tyler-o-neil/2020/09/29/second-project-veritas-video-sheds-light-on-ilhan-omar-cash-for-ballots-scheme-n984159
The Minneapolis Police Department (MPD) announced on Monday afternoon that it is “looking into” explosive “allegations of voter fraud” following a video that was released yesterday by Project Veritas that involves a campaign worker for Democrat Rep. Ilhan Omar (MN).
Yes JTF, I am a PROUD Liberal.What's your point? Oh yeah...you have none.
Trump is demanding drug tests and what...EAR INSPECTIONS?
LOL.
Plus more BS with no sources posted from our friend Anonymous...I mean..."JTF".
Are you completely unable to stay on subject?
You don't comment on Trump's obvious tax fraud.
You don't comment on him stealing from a children's cancer charity
You don't comment on McConnell's obvious hypocrisy
You don't comment on how I agree with most "traditional" conservative values.
It's time for the debates!
Know what that means? The JTFs of the internet are turning their distraction and deflection fire hoses to full blast!
A lie can race around the world before the truth has a chance to get its boots on.
Blogger Mozart1220 said...
How is twitter a reliable source? It's 99% opinions.
6:47 PM
Blogger Just the Facts! said...
Except for the videos.
7:03 PM Delete
Blogger Just the Facts! said...
Each of my links was to a video, clearly you haven't looked at one of them. So what do you have to lie about now?
Literally every conversation I've had with a Trump hater about the upcoming election:
Hater: I can't wait to get Donald Trump out of office.
Me: Why?
Hater: Why?!?! Don't tell me you don't think he colluded with Russia!
Me: According to Robert Mueller's exhaustive, multi-million dollar investigation, there was no evidence of that. But there was evidence that the Obama administration spied on him and his campaign using the FBI.
Hater: Well, he said he'd repeal and replace Obamacare. What happened to that?
Me: Well, he removed the tax penalty which removes the mandate. Congress now just has to move with it's replacement. He can't do it by Executive Order. You do know Obama had very little to do with the writing of the ACA, right?
Hater: Well, he said he'd build a wall and Mexico was gonna pay for it. Haha. What happened to that?
Me: They've built over 260 miles of new wall so far and he's renegotiated NAFTA costing Mexico billions of dollars that were given to them by Bill Clinton through the returning of jobs in America.
Hater: Well, that's not them paying for it!
Me: BILLIONS. Did you think he literally meant Mexico was gonna write a check with "Wall" in the memo?
Hater: Well, he's buddy buddy with Putin and Kim Jung Un.
Me: Getting along with your adversaries is not a bad thing. Or would you prefer he antagonize them? BTW, when was the last "test missile" North Korea sent Japan's way?
Hater: Well, he doesn't like the military! He called the dead soldiers "losers!"
Me: You're referring to a report made from "anonymous sources" when over nine people who were with the President that have gone on record saying that it wasn't true? That doesn't send up any red flags for you?
He's brought our Vets home and taken great strides, and put a lot of money into fixing the VA, ask any veteran you know. Funny way to treat people you think are "losers," don't you think?
Hater: Well, he got impeached for God's sake!
Me: Yes, impeached by a partisan House and subsequently acquitted as there was no evidence that the President did anything wrong (no quid pro quo) in his communication with the President of Ukraine. BTW, you know Joe Biden actually admitted on national television to doing that exact thing while he was in office as VP though, right?
Hater: Well he handled COVID horribly!
Me: What would've you done differently?
Hater: He didn't close the borders in time!
Me: He announce travel restrictions on 1/31 and was called xenophobic for doing so, all the while Nancy Pelosi and Bill Deblasio were walking in Chinatown telling everyone to come on down, the water is fine.
Hater: Well, he refused to wear a mask.
Me: Here's a picture of him wearing a mask.
Hater: Well, that was too far after!
Me: After what? He had two of his experts on national TV every day giving updates and telling everyone to wear a mask?
Hater: Well, he said everything will be fine and this will end!
Me: Did you want him to run around screaming that the sky was falling?
Hater: Well, listen to the way he talks! He's nasty! He's not how I want my President to sound.
Me: Ahhh. NOW we're getting somewhere. You don't like his personality. And everything you've mentioned up until now is because you don't like his personality.
So for you it seems personal and not about the job he's done.
So listen, if you want a President who will tell you whatever you want to hear, flip- flopping on every issue, not getting anything done his entire time while in office, but who sounds like a nice guy (even though he seems seriously impaired), then Joe Come on Man, Biden is definitely your man.
This comment has been removed by the author.
Hey JTF, get someone to read this too you, since there are no pictures.
https://www.justice.gov/storage/report.pdf
I'm not going to go through your entire Bible of nonsense, but in response to "Russian collusion" Vol I of the ACTUAL Mueller report (as opposed to Barr's "summary" clearly states that yes, Russia DID in fact interfere on trump's behalf in the 2016 election.
As for Trump being "spied" on, the FBI was investigating RUSSIANS doing that very thing. It's not the FBI or President Obama's fault that trump took the offer and invited them right into his home.
And if you watched the debate, Biden is CLEARLY not impaired, and in fact trump was the one that even had Fox Entertainment's Chris Wallace asking Trump to PLEASE shut up.
Oh, and Chinatown is in the USA, not China. Trump allowed 40,000 people to come into the country in the first week after his "travel ban".
Trump looked like a scared petulant child in the debates, and while Biden did get a bit testy, I'm surprised he didn;t punch Trump out.
Yes, Biden is definitely my man. Trump is not even a man.
Photos And Videos From Last Night’s Debate Allegedly Shows Some Sort Of Electric Device Under Biden’s Shirt
https://ussanews.com/News1/about-ussanews-com/
LOL.
Try a less biased source, like Info wars or The Blaze. jeez, man...Teabagger news? Wow.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/ussa-news/
JTF,
Your EXCUSE for trump LYING about Covid is the same BS we got from the right when Bush sat doing nothing for 7 minutes after being told "The nation is under attack".
"we didn;t want to scare the children"
Nice try, but I like to be informed about what is going on in a crisis. Imagine being a soldier, and your superiors find out that 1,000 enemy soldiers are coming your way.
"Let's not tell them, it will only scare them".
Simply pathetic JTF.
Perhaps, here's a thought, instead of looking at photos and clips... you should just actually watch the whole video. Had you, you'd be able to see with your own eyes that there was no 'sort of electric device under Biden's shirt'.
Also, if you and your wide-eyed conspiracy straw-grasping dittoheads online would exercise your atrophied critical thinking skills, you might start to wonder what purpose a mysterious non-existant electric device would have.
The "conservative" sphere today is as much of a train wreck as the President made the debate to be.
What do you think were the object(s) in Biden's shirt cuffs shown in the video?
I remember from the Bush debates there was clearly a devise strapped to Bush's back and it was the size of an old VHS tape.
But these issues are minor distractions, both Trump and Biden are China war hawks which means who ever wins the people lose. Losing a little less under Biden is just not enough for me.
Manufactured up "conservative" distraction designed so that you, JTF, don't have to think about the ridiculousness of our President's performance or the erosion of our political discourse and norms.
Typical TB3 deflection.
Literally answered your question directly.
Bravo on your use of deflection in response to a direct answer to your already deflecting question teed. Bravo.
"What do you think were the object(s) in Biden's shirt cuffs shown in the video?" And your answer is? Deflection. You have never answered a question TB3, never. As you again will not do.
That famed, Trumpian ability to make stuff up. All this time you've spent shotgunning falsehoods could have been better directed towards writing a novel. If you're so dead set on spinning fiction, you should do it for yourself and not for a President who is, at best, disinterested in your existence and your efforts to defend him.
If you call 'LOOK AT WHAT'S UP BIDEN'S SLEEVE' a defense.
Making my point TB3, just like I said. You NEVER answer a question but can only deflect...THANKS TB3, bless your heart. You are not worth wasting my time, and your posts are a waste of good band space. Gonna scroll right past them from now on.
What do you think were the object(s) in Biden's shirt cuffs shown in the video?"
https://ussanews.com/News1/about-ussanews-com/
The best part about this entire blog is JTF/Anonymous posts.
The lengths he goes to to avoid facts and deflect away from trump's obvious corruption are entertaining.
He's so embarrassed about Trump that he's actually trying to find ANY reason to attack Biden.
The objects in Biden's shirt cuffs were his wrists and hands. I can see why JTF would have a problem with a man who has normal sized hands.
His sources are so right wing they make Limbaugh look like a lefty. LOL
Also, notice that he NEVER EVER responds to actual issues like Trump's constant interruptions and refusal to allow even the moderator to speak?
Hey JTF/ Anonymous,
Did you read Vol I of the Mueller report I posted? I'm betting you didn;t.
Oh, Thank goodness JTF's finally giving up. Must have learned that from our President's press conferences.
JTF will never quit. He's obsessed with apologizing for trump and given his obscure "sources" it's probably taking him some time to find SOMETHING to attack Biden for.
Personally, I'm more afraid of what will happen when Biden wins given the maturity and intelligence of Trump supporters since trump encourages violence.
Biden Made It Clear Russia Could Have Crimea, Prevented Ukraine From Defending Itself, Then Sanctioned Moscow And Accused Trump Of Collusion.....
Joe Biden was taking money from organized crime figures in Ukraine, Burisma has admitted as much in a Ukrainian court.
https://creativedestructionmedia.com/investigations/2020/09/30/biden-made-it-clear-russia-could-have-crimea-prevented-ukraine-from-defending-itself-then-sanctioned-moscow-and-accused-trump-of-collusion/
Why has Tom removed his thread titled "THE GREAT 2020 AMERICAN SHIT SHOW"?
Cancel culture strikes again!
For the record:
Trump denounces white supremacy/racism/KKK.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DUdRS98R6B8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0qD47QFFkTU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S6PFZNruJes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hbiMYPNaG3c
Kamala Harris last year on Biden's praise for racist segregationists
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7qACwaPP_5c
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/06/27/harris-attacks-bidens-record-on-busing-and-working-with-segregationists.html
According to Rasmussen, after including one night of post-debate
polling in its five-day rolling average, Trump’s job approval rating
climbed from 46 to 49 percent, while his job disapproval number dropped
from 53 to 51 percent.
That is a six-point shift in Trump’s direction.
The real reason why the left doesn't want a second debate.
BIDEN: “I’m not opposed to the Justice.”
FACT: Biden and Harris have both publicly opposed Judge Amy Coney Barrett’s nomination to the Supreme Court, despite glowing reviews from the legal community and her colleagues.
Biden put out a statement in opposition to Judge Barrett’s nomination.
Biden’s running mate, Kamala Harris, tweeted that she strongly opposed Judge Barrett’s nomination
+++++++++++++++++++++
TRUMP: “You agreed with Bernie Sanders to the manifesto and now you’re disavowing it.” BIDEN: “There is no manifesto.”
FACT: There is a manifesto, and Biden’s campaign worked with Sanders' associates to write it.
In July, the Biden-Sanders Unity Task Force released a 118-page document filled with far-left, radical policies the Biden campaign has embraced. (https://www.politico.com/news/2020/07/08/biden-sanders-unity-task-force-recommendations-353225)
The task force included socialist Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Castro-sympathizer Rep. Karen Bass.
++++++++++++++++++++++
BIDEN: “What did he do? He went in, and he, we were insisting that the Chinese, the people we had on the ground in China should be able to go to Wuhan and determine for themselves how dangerous this was. He didn’t even ask [Chinese President] Xi to do that.”
FACT: The Trump Administration first tried to get American officials into China in early January; Biden didn’t call for sending experts into China until February 25, 50 days later.
This often repeated claim by Biden has been repeatedly debunked by fact-checkers.
The Washington Post fact checker gave Biden’s claim three Pinocchios.
CDC Director Robert Redfield offered to send CDC experts to China as early as January 4, and the issue was raised multiple times by Administration officials in the weeks after.
President Trump personally raised the issue in a call with Chinese leader Xi Jinping.
Biden did not call on China to admit U.S. experts until February 25, after U.S. officials were already on the ground.
It's funny that he's got so much stuff to sling at the walls to distract readers of this blog that he can't even be bothered to take a moment and log into his account to do it.
Such dedication to our Impeached President. Look at all these ancient Republicans scary words. Socialist. Manifesto. Castro-Sympathizer. And look at all those numbers and "facts". Pulled straight out of JTF's rear end or the rear end of whomever he's cut and pasting this information from. How are we to know? The one citation in this shotgun blast wasn't about any of the data and numbers presented. Rather the citation was supposed to back up the whole "manifesto" claim. Granted, Manifesto is simply a policy document. Everyone in the old US of A understands that calling it a manifesto has certain connotations to it. Call a 110 page policy recommendation document a "manifesto" and it elicits scary Communist Cold War wah wah the Commies are a-comin' feelings in certain old people. I think they're pulling out the ol' Manifesto-talk because unlike the Republicans, the Democrats made an effort to come together and produce a party platform to present to the American people. A stark alternative to the other party simply expressing to the American people that they'd fellate the President if that's what he wanted them to do.
Trump CRUSHED Biden So Badly That They Will Now CUT OFF His Mic In Next Debates, Its All Rigged
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=En8-SjzfEsU&feature=emb_logo
Raassmussen polls eh? LOL.
"After the 2010 midterm elections, Silver concluded that Rasmussen's polls were the least accurate of the major pollsters in 2010, having an average error of 5.8 points and a pro-Republican bias of 3.9 points according to Silver's model."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rasmussen_Reports#:~:text=After%20the%202010%20midterm%20elections,points%20according%20to%20Silver's%20model.
Typical liberal response to losing the debate, change the rules.
New guidance on AP Stylebook Online:
Use care in deciding which term best applies:
A riot is a wild or violent disturbance of the peace involving a group of people. The term riot suggests uncontrolled chaos and pandemonium. (1/5)
Focusing on rioting and property destruction rather than underlying grievance has been used in the past to stigmatize broad swaths of people protesting against lynching, police brutality or for racial justice, going back to the urban uprisings of the 1960s. (2/5)
— APStylebook (@APStylebook) September 30, 2020
“Focusing on rioting and property destruction rather than underlying grievance has been used in the past to stigmatize..” blah blah. As soon as a leftist org like the AP says “in the past” you KNOW they are selling smoke and calling it dinner.
So don't piss on my shoes and tell me its raining. I know the difference between a MLK protest and a ANTIFA/BLM riot.
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/519160-biden-opens-up-13-point-lead-over-trump-in-new-national-poll
https://www.usnews.com/news/elections/articles/2020-10-01/joe-biden-leads-donald-trump-by-13-points-after-first-debate-poll-finds
JTF/ Anonymous
We didn;t change any rules. Trump refused to follow the rules of the debate.All he did was attack Biden, and interrupt whenever Biden or the moderator tried to speak
Just because a news organization doesn't kiss trump's ass doesn't mean it's "leftist".
And there is nothing bad about "leftist" that I can see. According to the Bible, JESUS was "leftist".
The riots are caused by right wing storm troopers encouraged if not HIRED by Trump to discredit the PEACEFUL protesters. They even changed their logo to "Stand down and stand by" after trump instructed them to do so.
Trump refused to follw the rules of the debates, which is why BOTH the candidates will have mute buttons next time
Seriously? Moderator of Second Presidential Debate Served as an Intern for Joe Biden???
C-SPAN’s Steve Scully, who will moderate the second presidential debate, got his start as a staff assistant in Sen. Ted Kennedy’s communication office, and prior to that worked as in intern in the office of then-senator Joe Biden.
Of course the left wants to give HIM the mute button. It's just another example of cheating by the left, they can't win with out cheating..That's why the left won't support Congresswoman's bill to stop ballot fraud. They need to cheat to win.
Trump gets HIGHEST approval rating from Gallup. A poll conducted in the lead-up to Tuesday’s presidential debate showed Americans giving President Trump his highest approval rating in months while a majority predicted he would defeat former Vice President Joe Biden in November.
Gallup released its results on Thursday, claiming that Trump saw his highest approval rating (46%) since May with approvals on his handling of certain issues, other than the economy, below 50%.
Biden Suddenly Desperately Trying To Deploy People In Battleground States. Biden this weekend will dispatch several hundred newly trained volunteers to engage voters across Nevada, Michigan, New Hampshire and Pennsylvania.
Let's see Rasmussen, now Gallup. LOL
I'm uncertain as to what JTF's point is, but I'm sure he's trying to make one. Or at least he's cut and pasting someone's point for them.
"Looking back, Gallup has asked Americans for their predictions in the late summer or fall of every presidential election year from 1996 through 2012, and an ABC News/Washington Post poll included a comparable question in 2016. In each of these polls, Americans accurately predicted the winner of the popular vote, though not the winner of the Electoral College. That is, in 2000 and 2016, the public predicted Al Gore and Hillary Clinton, respectively, would win the election. Although both of these Democratic candidates won the popular vote, George W. Bush and Trump, respectively, won the most electoral votes and ultimately became president.
The prediction of a Trump victory is not consistent with the average of recent national presidential vote-preference polls, which show Biden with a significant lead, but it is consistent with Americans' expectation of a victory for the incumbent president in every race in which one has been running. The two most recent elections in which an incumbent lost -- 1980 and 1992 -- occurred before Gallup began asking Americans to handicap the presidential election race."
https://news.gallup.com/poll/321347/trump-pre-debate-job-approval-highest-may.aspx
Post a Comment
<< Home